OUR BUSINESS
SANBS embraces risk and opportunity management as an essential enabler for setting and achieving its strategic objectives and fulfilling its purpose of being ‘Trusted to Save Lives.’ This approach emphasises our commitment to continuous improvement, which is vital for building resilience and remaining relevant in the ever-evolving landscape of the future.
Risk management is governed by an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework which provides a solid foundation to guide the organisation in embedding structured risk management processes to deliver sustained value.
Through the ERM process, risks and opportunities, which could affect the achievement of our iHEALTh strategy, are identified and managed within defined risk appetite and tolerance levels set by the Board. Management decisions to tolerate, treat, terminate or share risks and opportunities are taken based on these parameters.
As an essential healthcare service provider, it is prudent that SANBS protects its donors, patients and stakeholders from the potential adverse effects of risk and it has therefore adopted a conservative risk approach.
SANBS follows an iterative and dynamic risk management process to ensure ongoing identification and evaluation of risks and opportunities in response to a continually evolving and rapidly changing internal and external environment. Risks and opportunities are also identified through stakeholder engagement.
Oversight of risk management is the responsibility of the Risk, Technology and Information Governance Committee.
Our material matters are reflected in our key risks and opportunities and represent the issues that have the most impact on our ability to create sustainable value for our stakeholders and influence our business model.
Of significance during the reporting period are:
Our ERM framework is premised on global practical risk management practices including ISO31000 and King IV™, and includes the identification, analysis, evaluation, treatment and monitoring of risks and opportunities from a position where we understand the context of our internal and external business environment and the impact on our iHEALTh strategy.
*Figure 1 demonstrates how the effort is driven by the Board, Senior and Middle Management to manage and report on risks.
**In addition, all lines of assurance are included as part of the Board and Board Committee oversight to ensure that roles, responsibilities and accountabilities for risk are clearly defined. See Figure 2.
Strategy level risks – March 2023
RISK PROFILE TREND | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | Strategy level risks – March 2023 | Short term | FY23 | FY22 | FY21 | FY20 | FY19 |
1 | Ineffective and inefficient order-to-collect process | 1 | - | - | - | - | |
2 | Inability to remain financially sustainable | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | |
3 | Impact of weak internal controls on compliance and financial assurance | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | |
4 | Loss of public/stakeholder confidence | 4 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 1 | |
5 | Inadequate management of information/data relating to: | 5 | - | - | - | - | |
6 | Inability to consistently meet all demand for specific blood products | 6 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 10 | |
7 | Political/socio-economic instability leading to civil unrest | 7 | - | - | - | - | |
8 | Inability to attract and retain highly specialised/portable/scarce skills | 8 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |
9 | Adverse impact of poor organisational culture | 9 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 1 | |
10 | Non-compliance with regulatory requirements | 10 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 7 | |
11 | Ineffective and inefficient procure-to-pay process | 11 | 11 | 11 | - | - |
RISK PROFILE TREND | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | Strategy level risks – March 2023 | Short term | FY23 | FY22 | FY21 | FY20 | FY19 |
12 | Disruption in business operations | 12 | - | - | - | - | |
13 | Failure to be innovative | 13 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 8 | |
14 | Uncertainty as to the impact of the NHI implementation on the SANBS business model | 14 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 9 | |
15 | Compromised safety and quality of blood products | 15 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 4 | |
16 | Failure to provide and maintain stable information management systems | 16 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | |
17 | Environmental sustainability | 17 | - | - | - | - |